- Coding Beauty
- Posts
- AI coding agents are not glorified StackOverflow
AI coding agents are not glorified StackOverflow
They refuse to accept reality
Featured content
It’s a common pushback I hear from the usual AI deniers.
Oh Tari why are you hyping this thing up so much lol, it’s no different from copying and pasting from StackOverflow for goodness sake. Just calm down bro.
They refuse to accept reality.
Like how could you possibly equate those two?
It’s like saying hiring a chef to cook a meal is no different from searching for recipe and doing the cooking yourself.
Just because the same knowledge is used in both cases, or what?
It makes no sense.
AI agents are not “improved Google” or “improved StackOverflow”.
Can StackOverflow build entire features from scratch spanning multiple files in your project?

Can StackOverflow do this?
Can Google fix errors in your code with something as simple as “what’s wrong with this code”?
Do they have any deep contextual access to your code to know what you could possibly mean with an instruction as vague as that?
All StackOverflow and Google can do is give you fragments of generic information — you have to do the reasoning yourself.
It‘s up to you to specialize and integrate the information into your project.
Start learning AI in 2025
Keeping up with AI is hard – we get it!
That’s why over 1M professionals read Superhuman AI to stay ahead.
Get daily AI news, tools, and tutorials
Learn new AI skills you can use at work in 3 mins a day
Become 10X more productive
Best,
Tari Ibaba
The Coding Beauty team